Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
First draft
This The famous term has been introduced by Thomas Nagel in (add reference). It is often used to characterize [[phenomenal consciousness]] or [[phenomenal properties]].
== Ways * Some take "what it is like to understand this term ==This term can be understood/used in various different ways" to denote a property which some [[mental states]] have, ewhereas others don't.g.:* As a reference Some take it to refer to some parts/properties/features/elements/aspects of [[conscious experience or ]] of [[phenomenal consciousness]]. For this to make sense One conclusion of Nagel's seminal article<ref>Nagel, there would also have Thomas. "What is it like to be partsa bat?." The philosophical review 83.4 (1974): 435-450.</properties/features/elements/aspects which are not referenced by this ref> is that neither science nor philosophy has the beginnings of a conception of the ''identity of what the term.* As "what it is like to be" refers to, on the one hand, and a property which some [[mental states]] havephysical state, whereas others donon the other''t== References ==<references />

Navigation menu