Changes

{{note|This page has not yet reached minimally viable content. Please help improve the page and remove this note when appropriate.}}The famous term has been introduced by Thomas Nagel in (add reference). It is often used to characterize [[phenomenal consciousness]] or [[phenomenal properties]].

== Ways * Some take "what it is like to understand this term ==This term can be understood/used in various different ways" to denote a property which some [[mental states]] have, e.gwhereas others don't.:* As a reference Some take it to refer to some parts/properties/features/elements/aspects of [[conscious experience ]] or [[phenomenal consciousness]]. For this to make sense One conclusion of (Nagel, 1974)<ref>Nagel, there would also have Thomas. "What is it like to be partsa bat?." The philosophical review 83.4 (1974): 435-450.</properties/features/elements/aspects which are not referenced by this ref> is that neither science nor philosophy has the beginnings of a conception of the ''identity of what the term.* As "what it is like to be" refers to, on the one hand, and a property which some [[mental states]] havephysical state, whereas others donon the other''t.*...== References ==<references />