Difference between revisions of "Qualitative Character"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
(Nida-Rümelin 2016) argues that it is wrong to attribute ''qualitative character'' to experiences or states of consciousness. Rather, "experiences have 'qualitative character' only in the sense that they involve an experiencing subject who instantiates [[experiential properties]]".<ref>Martine Nida-Rümelin, ''The experience property frame work'', 2016</ref> | (Nida-Rümelin 2016) argues that it is wrong to attribute ''qualitative character'' to experiences or states of consciousness. Rather, "experiences have 'qualitative character' only in the sense that they involve an experiencing subject who instantiates [[experiential properties]]".<ref>Martine Nida-Rümelin, ''The experience property frame work'', 2016</ref> | ||
| − | In [[neurophenomenology]], | + | In [[neurophenomenology]], ''qualitative aspect'', or qualitative character, is occasionally being used to denote the ''unnoticed aspects'' of experience. This is thought to relate to pre-reflexive self-awareness. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 09:38, 12 July 2022
Note: This page has not yet reached minimally viable content. Please help improve the page and remove this note when appropriate.
The term qualitative character is commonly used to express that there is something it is like for the experiencing subject to undergo an experience.[1]
(Nida-Rümelin 2016) argues that it is wrong to attribute qualitative character to experiences or states of consciousness. Rather, "experiences have 'qualitative character' only in the sense that they involve an experiencing subject who instantiates experiential properties".[2]
In neurophenomenology, qualitative aspect, or qualitative character, is occasionally being used to denote the unnoticed aspects of experience. This is thought to relate to pre-reflexive self-awareness.
